Showing posts with label Aquarius. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Aquarius. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 19, 2011

Farewell to Capricorn, hello Aquarius



Sidereal zodiac controversies not withstanding, 1/19 is the last day of Capricorn. 1/20 will be the first day of Aquarius. I am sad to see you go. However, Aquarius time should be interesting. The specific synastry engines say this is a good season for me. The generalists would say no.

One thing is for sure: It will be a season of change for me. The final word has come through from my health insurance. I am approved for Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery. My surgery date is 2/3. Tomorrow is my last day of eating normally... perhaps forever. There will be a new normal established within 12 months. That will not be like the old normal. Hopefully this will include 100+ pounds of weight loss.

I should go from the build of a short fat nose tackle to that of a short safety. The road is going to be very difficult and painful, I am sure, but the relief of osteo-arthritic pain alone should make the journey worthwhile.

I hope I will have sufficient energy in the weeks ahead to continue blogging at a regular rate. I don't know if this will be possible. I have been sternly warned to expect little or nothing during the first 10 days of my recovery. I have been told that you are extremely fatigued during this time.

It sounds bad folks. We are at risk for blood clots and pneumonia for 30 days after surgery. We must walk a mile per day, or perform an equivalent exercise, beginning immediately after the surgery. The day of the surgery, they are going to walk us around the hospital. Sounds stupid, but it is necessary because of gas bubble formation in the gut. Believe it or not, they are actually going to walk us to make us fart it out. I mean that literally.

If you can imagine the horror of 20 or 30 gastric bypass patients walking around a hospital floor farting after having their innards cut...

I am presuming that by Taurus time--the middle of spring--I aught to be well on my way. It will be 100+ days since my surgery. I should have lost some 60 to 70 pounds by then. The pain in my knees and ankle should subside quite a bit as the result of the lighter load.

In this past year, I have attempted to develop skill in cooking an assortment of casserole-style dishes. These are the preferred types of meals after recovery from surgery. The dishes are nutritionally complete, containing grains, vegetables, proteins, and water. Moisture, tenderness, and small particle sizes are all important. Casseroles fit the bill.

During the liquid diet before and after the surgery, I am going to become an expert in soups and smoothies. That's all I can do in the first 2 weeks and a full month after the surgery. Many have told me to expect 2 to 3 months of a liquid regime. It depends on how fast your guts heal.

One stupid question that worries my mind: Virgo is said to rule the intestines and digestive tract. If you cut the stomach and intestines of a Virgo, what is left of the man? This is one of the stupid questions that bother me late at night.

Sunday, November 28, 2010

The Air Adept


I discovered a very interesting concept recently while doing a bit of reading online. It revolves around the concept of an Elemental Adept in Astrology. Before discussing the concept, we should review the following points.

  • None of my major planets are in any of the three air signs.
  • I have just one minor asteroid, Ceres, in Gemini.
  • None of my immediate family members have a sun sign of Gemini, Libra, or Aquarius.
  • My maternal grandmother and my aunt Salome are the only two members of my family who had air signs. My grandmother was a Gemini. My aunt is a Libra. My grandmother died when I was still relatively young. I have had comparatively little contact with my aunt Salome, as she lives in Ecuador.
  • Until recently, I have had relatively few people around me who were air sign people. Now, suddenly, most of the guys around me in the MIS/IT Department are air sign guys. This is not a bad thing. I am very comfortable with this group.

So what does all that mean? Well, there is a funny little thing about all this… This has to do with the astrological concept of an Adept. Those who have Zero (0) major planets in a given element are said to be Adepts in that element. I have no major planets in the air signs. I am, therefore, an Air Adept. If you have no planets in the Earth signs, as is the case with my Brother, you are an Earth Adept.

Okay, fine, so what does that mean? It means that I mastered the skills, nature and character of the air element in my past lives. The 7 Masters of fate, sitting in the Akashic Record Library, wish to guide me away from the air I know so well. They are pushing me to master another element in this lifetime. The temptation to do the same old thing has been removed in this lifetime. Since I have 5 major power planets in Earth signs (Virgo and Taurus), I would presume that my new challenge is the Earth. Presumably, my brother has mastered the Earth, and is being pushed in a different direction this time around.

Hummmmmm… Sounds strange, eh? Hold on. It gets even stranger and more interesting than that. To quote the Astrological Dictionary:

“An adept has highly evolved traits, skills, or expressions in the element that is missing from their birth chart, presumably because those abilities have already been mastered. Adepts are able to pass the energy of their mastered elements to other people, but not to themselves unless they have made the other elements conscious as well in their own lives.” [The Total Idiots Guide: Astrological Dictionary, Page 3]

The really interesting thing about that is that I found myself in pretty strong accord with many of the things I read about the three air signs. This was not true with the fire or water signs. Interestingly, I have found the many descriptions of the three water signs to be the most distasteful and repugnant descriptions I’ve read. Of all the descriptions of all 12 constellations/signs the ones I find most attractive, winsome, appealing and interesting are the descriptions of Gemini, Libra and Aquarius. I would rank the three air signs from last to first in terms of my personal preference: Aquarius, Libra and Gemini; Aquarius being my favorite.

Now for the riddle: Virgos ain’t supposed to feel that way. We’re not supposed to find Water repugnant and Air attractive. We are supposed to find Water winsome and Air tiresome. Virgo and Aquarius are not supposed to match up well in a romantic or sexual sense. Most Virgos score low against Aquarius, and visa-versa. Not me, baby. I do not score low. I have some infrared Grill romance scores versus Aquarius. Scores over 400 are not uncommon for me. I have some approaching 500. This is bizarre because Virgo is supposed to be a cold sign, and Aquarius is supposed to be sub-zero. Why so much heat between generally incompatible—and cold—signs?

Just to thicken the riddle a bit, almost all Virgos score highest against Capricorn and Taurus. My Capricorn and Taurus scores are far from my best. I score better against Virgo than either Capricorn or Taurus. I like Capricorns, but they don’t seem to like me. I think Taurus girls are usually drop-dead sexy, but I have never dated one. Virgos are supposed to score high against three water signs: Cancer, Scorpio and Pisces, with Pisces being the best of the three for Virgo. My scores are indicative of that generalization, and I have dated Pisces girls, but I am far from comfortable with this fact

Now if you sit back and think about the legend and lore of the zodiac for 20 minutes, all of this might make some sense out of the riddles of my chart. If I am an air adept, I am supposed to be able to pass the energy and skills of my mastered elements on to other people; for instance, Aquarius women. They should feel something they recognize in me. Further, I should have a strong sense of familiarity with them. Moreover, if I have mastered the air, I should prefer the most highly evolved air signs over the less developed air signs. This means Aquarius first, Libra second, Gemini last.

Conversely, this helps to explain why I find the descriptions of the three water signs repugnant, and read those pages with disdain. According to the many descriptions I have read, water is about the triumph of emotion and feeling over and against logic and evidence. The proposition that emotion should trump reason not only seems false to me, but incredibly dangerous. Still, I do know emotional foolhardy buffoons who subscribe to this bad philosophy. I see it every time a political street mob forms somewhere in the world and executes a riots.

Are you saying high-emotion threatens social order? Yep, high emotion threatens order. It is a disorderly, wild, irrational thing.

It is said that water people coined the term “emotional intelligence”, a phrase I consider to be an oxymoron. Emotion is not intelligence, and should not be confused with it. You feel with the lower reptilian brain, with lots of help from your endocrine system. Emotion is supplied by the most ancient and primitive components of the brain. Intelligence is supplied by the cerebral cortex, the latest and most modern component of the human brain. You should not confuse emotion and intelligence any more than you confuse fire and ice.

Incidentally, Dr. Freud tells us that the intellectual component of the brain, or the cerebral cortex is engaged in a constant struggle with the animal drives of the lower brain. But I digress…

The concept of the Air Adept helps to explain why I am leery of Scorpio and Pisces, when I should not be. Generally speaking, I am fine with Cancer. The nice, cool, cold, logical, mathematical, precise, dispassionate character of the air does not mix well with the high-emotionalism of the water. Ergo, I find water signs the least trustworthy and most suspect of the dirty dozen. The more developed you are in the direction of Emotional Intelligence, the less likely I am to view you as solid or reliable.

This concept would also help explain why Capricorns and Taurus don’t find me to be particularly compelling company. If I come off Airy, they would find me abstract, boring, pedantic, and a trifle cold. Earth people do maintain a stone-face in ordinary life, but they can be very warm in the right (homey) setting. On the other hand, my fellow cerebral Virgos just might (and usually do) find me to be pretty interesting company.

Thursday, September 2, 2010

The Synastry Files, Part 2

So the company has me hopping these days. I will have time for only a short entry as a big batch job runs, under my careful supervision.

Last night I typed in the birthdates for over 100 female Geminis of my generation. Together with the Gemini dates already in the celebrity database, I had close to 200 total samples. I discarded many from generations gone by as un-interesting, and possibly detrimental to the scores.

For only the second time, I tried an automated batch tool inside Kepler 7.0 called "Match Maker". It was difficult, but possible, for me to segregate the Geminis into their own group, and compare them to my chart. The tool sequentially compares any given chart to that of any collection in the database. The results are presented in sorted order, high to low or low to high, which ever you prefer.

The results were remarkable. The Geminis are now the second hottest group behind the Libras. Their scores ran well ahead of the Aquarians, who also show unusually high scores versus my chart. The Gemini scores ranged between 0 and 323, with Mode, mean and median right around 138. There were several scores in the high 200s. They could not eclipse the scores of the top Libras, but the broke into the top 5.

Unfortunately, the aggression figures were also high. Gemini aggression scores were not as high as Libra aggression scores, but then again, neither were their romantic and sexual attraction scores. Both Libra and Gemini aggression scores are higher than the romantic and sexual attraction scores. The results with Aquarians were similar.

Incidentally, Angelina Jolie happens to be a Gemini. She comes pre-packaged in the celebrity database. I have a romantic and sexual attraction score of 64 versus Angelina. That might be a bit on the high side. Strangely, we have an aggression score of just 8 points. This is the lowest I have seen among the Air clan. Go figure.

This has left me scratching my head. Why does the elevated sexual score walk hand in hand and side by side with an elevated aggression score? Is this bullshit? Is this even possible?

After a bit of reading on the psychology of intense sexual relationships, it would seem that the answer is "No it's not bullshit, and yes it is entirely possible."

Those who study these things basically say that the blowtorch that burns 10 times as hot burns 10% as long. You can't get into one of these red-hot burners without getting burned out.

Further, there is a much more profound point to be found here. There is only one way you can enter into one of these red-hot burners, and that is through the gateway of hyper-sensitivity. If you not hyper-sensitive to everything your lover does, the relationship just won't be that intense. If you are hyper sensitive to your lover, every little thing she does is magic. Every little sway of the hips, every little brush or her hand, every little bat or her eyelashes will set you on fire.

There is a dark side to that force. If you are hyper-sensitive to her, any careless word, any little criticism, any sign of anger from her can demolish you to a pile of rubble. Further, any little criticism from you, any little sign of anger, any little bit of ingratitude or rejection will wound her to the core.

This is why those deep the throws of love can fight like mad putbulls in a steel cage.

If these Synastry scores are to be believed, I could easily get into one of the blow-torch relationships with a Libra like Kim Kardashian. All air women are somewhat likely candidates for this kind of relationship. These figures indicate that it would be a hyper-sensitive and unstable affair. It would be delicious in the extreme, and painful in the same measure.

I think Tony Romo and Jessica Simpson had one of these relationships. I need to check their Synastry figures...

Tuesday, August 31, 2010

The Synastry Files



Why Libra...?

So the research project continues with very interesting results. The Libras occupy the top 6 slots of the leader board. The scores are pretty well off the chart. Regrettably, so too are the aggression scores. Terrifying...

Another interesting finding seems to be emerging. The Aquarians are starting to show up strong. I haven't found one that can crack the Libra hegemony over the top 6, but the Aquarians are starting to show scores in the 180-220 range, which is remarkable, to say the least. The Aquarian reports also show high aggression scores, similar to the Libras, but in the 300 range.

Oh well, Tom Landry and Rodger Staubach didn't always get along. They blew their cool around each other a few times. They still formed one of the most famous partnerships in NFL history, and Landry is still Staubach's biggest fan. Incidentally, I happen to have Staubach's jersey hanging up in my cubical at work, so I think pretty well of him also.

I have not yet run the Gemini charts yet, but I am expecting those to show strong scores also.

Why? I am formulating a theory about this with the help of several websites. Many astrological sources will tell you can't match sun signs with sun signs per se. The logic is foul. You can only match whole charts with whole charts, looking at complex aspects. Nevertheless, certain common patterns do emerge.

Common pattern #1: Opposites attract. You heard the Paula Abdul song. In romance, the key principle is called erotic complementarity. In genetics the principle is called hybrid vigor. She brings something to the pot luck. You bring something else. Together, you put together a complete program. Since romance is a function of reproduction, and reproduction is a genetic thing, you need to think of this as you would DNA and RNA. Any biochemist worth a damn will tell you a strand of RNA is the exact mirror opposite of it's DNA counterpart.

You see, my thinking has been entirely wrong up to this point. I am a predominantly earth guy. I have 5 Virgos and one Taurus in my chart. After that, I have three key fire signs: Aries moon, Leo Venus, Leo Mars (just like Tim Tebow). The rest is water; one each of Scorpio, Pisces, Cancer. I haven't got the slightest shred of air in my chart.

Ergo, I should go after a predominantly air-girl, with little or no earth in her chart. She brings something to the table I don't have. I may bring something to the table she doesn't have. Together, we have compliantly. It's supposed to work.

I thought it was other way around. I thought I would be best off with an earthy girl, preferably of the Capricorn clan. I have been dismayed by how many mediocre/average scores I have seen comparing my chart to Capricorn women. I like them, and they don't exactly hate me, but evidently they don't think it's a hot match up. They are luke-warm to say the least. The story of my life thus far...

If these scores are to be believed, the air girls do think its a (real) hot match-up. Libra is an Air sign. Aquarius is an air sign. Gemini is an air sign. The approaching series of Gemini tests will be the critical key in qualifying this theory.

If some sources are to be believed, the Gemini scores will be hotter than the Libra scores. Mercury rules Gemini and Virgo. They are supposed to be the most mental signs of the Zodiac, with Aquarius coming in 3rd. Ergo, it is a hot match. Really?

I doubt this theory. First of all, how much hotter does it get than 357 to 371? Higher than this is nearly inconceivable. Second, I have never had a liaison or affair of the heart with a Gemini girl. Third, my Grandma was a Gemini. Despite the fact that I was her grandson, and I loved her, I have to tell you we didn't see eye to eye about a lot of things. This is where those fearsome aggression numbers would seem to manifest themselves. I used to make grandma plenty mad, and visa-versa. Finally, some of my least favorite stars (read Angelina Jolie) are Geminis.

How a Capricorn like Brad Pitt hooked up with a Gemini like Angelina Jolie... Brad, you are letting your earth brothers down.

Still, if there happens to be some magnificent Gemini chick waiting around out there for me...

Monday, August 23, 2010

Proof positive that Virgo and Aquarius can get along


So I've been slagging the Aquarians quite a bit, according to some. A lot of my favorite people do happen to be Aquarians. Believe it or not, there is concrete positive proof that Virgo and Aquarius can, in fact, get along. Have a look at the indisputable photographic evidence right here.

Here are a few of my favorite Aquarians.
  1. Rutger Hauer
  2. Oral Roberts
  3. Paul Newman
  4. Wayne Gretsky
  5. Mozart
  6. Anton Chekov
  7. Tom Selleck
  8. F.D.R.
  9. Vanessa Redgrave
  10. Jackie Robinson
  11. Sir Francis Bacon
  12. Clark Gable
  13. Farrah Fawcett
  14. Christie Brinkley
  15. Dan Quayle
  16. Alice Cooper
  17. Hank Aaron
  18. Babe Ruth
  19. Ronald Reagan
  20. Zsa Zsa Gabor
  21. Rip Torn
  22. Tom Brokaw
  23. Charles Dickens
  24. Garth Brooks
  25. Lana Turner
  26. Jules Vern
  27. Jack Lemmon
  28. Joe Pesci
  29. Burt Reynolds
  30. Abraham Lincoln
  31. Charles Darwin
  32. Lorne Greene
  33. Chynna Philips
  34. Kim Novak
  35. Jack Benny
  36. Hugh Downs
  37. Thomas Malthus
  38. Charles Schwab
So as you can see, the Aquarians make the best actors. They also make controversial but important presidents.