Sunday, February 19, 2012
The end of Carpal Tunnel: Time for more surgery.
As it happened, I lived past age 41, and I have had 3 surgeries in the past 3 years. Really, it's more like 3 surgeries in the past 26 calendar months. I've had both knees done, and the gastric bypass.
Guess what? It's time for more. Surgery number 4 & 5 are on tap over the next two months. Dr. Eli Ziv, a buddy and partner of Dr. Bachner, will be cutting into the palms of my hands. I was supposed to contact that surgical scheduler Friday to set the date for my right hand. I hesitated. I'll get to him Monday. We'll get the left hand next... Dr. Ziv is the hand specialist in the orthopedic surgery group Bachner is partnered with. His mother-in-law also happens to work for my company.
I am a little queezey, but grateful. This will be the end of the Carpal Tunnel that's (1) holding me back and (2) driving me crazy. Although I detest going under the knife again, this syndrome can't end soon enough. The sooner the better.
So just what is Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS), and how do you fix it surgically? First, CTS is not tendinitis created by typing all-day-long. To be frank, it's not even a repetitive stress injury. Incompetent doctors of the 1990s characterized it as such when it was a very trendy diagnosis in the new era of info-tech employees.
True CTS occurs when the transverse carpal ligament in the palm of your hands grow stronger, larger, heavier, or inflamed. When this occurs, the ligament applies a crushing pressure on the median nerve that runs along the Carpal tunnel of the wrist. This crushing pressure effectively cuts off the electrical signal from the brain to portions of the hand. The solution is to surgically bisect the transverse carpal ligament. Cut in half, the transverse carpal ligament can no longer apply a crushing pressure to the carpal tunnel or the median nerve. The condition is eliminated.
So you slash a tendon, leave it slashed in half, and you release the pressure. Whooooooaaaaa! Slashing tendons permanently? Isn't that going to cripple your hands?
Nope. It turns out that the transverse carpal ligament is an evolutionary vestige of biological epochs long gone. It is just like the appendix in your intestines. It now serves no purpose. Anthropologists, of whom I am one, believe that this vestige was once used by human ancestors who walked on all fours, on the palms of their hands. The transverse carpal ligament helps the palm of the hand function better as a heel, but not much in this day and age. It has degenerated considerably.
Ergo, you can slash it without any long-term ill-effects. In the short-run it hurts like a sonofabitch. More hydrocodone.
When Doctor Ziv explained all this to me, my natural response was "Well shit, Doc! You shouldn't have told me that! I have a perfectly good Spyderco ZDP-189 knife right here in my pocket. I'll fix that nasty transverse carpal ligament right here, right now. I am DIY guy!"
Nah! Just kidding.
So the question remains: how in the world does the transverse carpal ligament grow strong, heavier, swollen, or inflamed? How the hell does any tendon grow thicker and stronger? Through exercise and heavy use, that's how.
Who knows what it was in my case. Was it the shake weight? Was it the kettlebells? Was it push-ups and pull-ups? Was it the ROM? Was it Elliptical Cross Trainer? Was it Olympic Rowing? In sooth, I shall never know. The key point is that I subjected myself to a vast array of exercises over the 10 months prior to the eruption of this problem, and all of them could have contributed to the strengthening of this ligament.
Dr. Ziv also mentioned that hormonal changes could contribute to the thickening and strengthening of this ligament. What hormonal changes? To the best of my knowledge, ligaments and tendons only respond strongly to one hormone: HGH, human growth hormone. This is released in great quantities during weight loss, and body building. Many of the substances I use promote the release of HGH. I am sure that the quasi-natural supply of HGH in my body is way higher now than it was 1 year ago. This is why I am doing the Benjamin Button thing. HGH is the key hormone in age-reversal.
Unfortunately, even this blessed condition can have unwanted side-effects. I hit the Jack-Pot again. This means I get to have surgeries #4 and #5. Shit...
In verity and sooth, this isn't all that bad. Dr. Ziv says that there is only about a 5% chance that the transverse carpal ligament can regenerate, and the CTS re-appear. There is a 95% chance that he will slash my wrist, and I will never be bothered by this condition for the rest of my life. When you think about all that I have gained (and lost) in the past year, this isn't such a high price to pay. It could have been dramatically worse.
If everything works out for me, this will be a one-time-only fix, and I can go on about my business.
Saturday, December 17, 2011
183.4 and I hope I am not loosing my muscle
Lately, I've been cruising around 184.8 to 186.9. That is approximately a 2 pound range. That is a normal oscillation factor. This can be accounted for by body-water and body-waste. I've been bouncing around in that range for more than one month.
But this was before I learned how to cook beans...
What is the big deal about beans? It turns out that beans, all kinds of beans, constitute a diet super-food. Just about every "get-ripped" diet focuses hard on consuming beans. If the rhetoric from countless certified dietitians is to be believed, beans are a magic weight-loss food. They deliver a pretty solid nutrient pop, whilst being low in calories and high in fiber. They deliver a lot of mass with a very small calorie load. You can eat your fill of beans and wind up with a low calorie total... Even if you have a big stomach. If you have a 90% surgically reduced stomach, as I do, your fill of beans constitutes almost nothing in terms of calorie load.
My family never ate much in the way of beans as I was growing up. Bean dishes were frowned upon as "poor-man's food." This fact may well be implied by my former body weight. Consequently, on those rare occasions when I attempted to cook them, it didn't work out well. I didn't know how to cook them well.
It doesn't help that 8-24 hours of soaking is called for my many recipes. That's 8-24 hours of soaking before several hours of simmering. It doesn't help that the "speed method" involves boiling and resting for one hour before pressure cooking. All of these methods are long. In stark contrast, rice can be prepped in 12-30 minutes if you use the speediest methods.
It turns out there is a rapid method. You put 8 oz of raw/dry/hard beans (by volume) in 32 ounces of clean water, and you pressure cook for 31 minutes. My Cuisinart electric pressure cooker needs 31 to do a masterful job. Your pressure cooker may need less. Once the beans are done, you discard he water by draining them in a colander. You then dress them like salad: Olive oil, a tab of butter, some balsamic vinegar, a dash of Tabasco sauce, and a generous amount of sea salt gets the job done.
If you pressure cook the beans with some fresh Thyme, Bay leaves, and Rosemary, you will like the results better. You also need a bit of oil in the brew to prevent foaming.
Speaking of salt, salt was the absolute key factor in my past failures with beans. No salt until they are done pressure cooking. No salt when you soak. No salt when you boil. No salt when you pressure cook. No salt until they are done.
This is contrary to all culinary laws, and highly counter-intuitive. Still this is correct. No salt until they are done. The answer lies in the chemical composition of the bean skin. The bean's skin reacts chemically with the salt. It hardens enormously on contact with salt. This will prevent the bean from cooking. What you get is a rock-hard bean that is inedible. If you forgo all salt until they are done, they come out fine.
Since I learned how to cook them, I have fallen in love with beans. I eat a lot of them now. They are great in pesto sauce also. Coincidentally, beans in pesto makes for a very nutrient rich mixture, especially if you use spinach and mixed nuts to make the pesto. The calorie load goes up a bit, but it still isn't bad. They are delicious together.
This remarkable drop into the 183.4 just might indicate that the bean diet is working. On the other hand, it may indicate I am losing my muscle. I sure hope the latter isn't the case.
Saturday, September 17, 2011
Bod Pod X: Moderate Risk


So I had my 10th Bod Pod test this morning. It was pretty good. As per usual, it was not everything I had hoped, but (all things considered) it was a pretty damn good milestone. Just like Super Bowl X once was once regarded, this was the best one ever (thus far).
- My total weight was 196.731, a little higher than expected, but a reduction of 7.003 pounds
- My fat-mass went down from 55.912 pounds to 48.964 pounds; a reduction of 6.948 pounds
- My lean weight decreased from 147.821 to 147.767 pounds. This is scarcely 0.05299 of a pound, or 0.86 of one ounce of loss. This is within the margin of error.
- My Body Fat Percentage decreased from 27.4% to 24.9%. This is a reduction of 2.5%, and just barely enough to move me into the Moderate Risk Category.
- Conversely, my lean percentage increased from 72.6% to 75.1%.
- My body volume decreased from 89.135 to 85.61 liters; a reduction of 3.525 liters.
- I have reduced my body fat percentage 19.2% from 44.1 to 24.9.
- I have lost 65.126 pounds of pure fat, down from 114.09 to 48.964 pounds.
- I have increased my lean weight 3.027 pounds. I am still net-positive on the lean weight front.
- I have decreased my total weight 61.92 pounds, down from 258.651 to 196.731 pounds.
- I have decreased my body volume 31.5 liters, from 117.111 to 85.61 liters.
Tuesday, September 13, 2011
199.2 and so close
- The Tanita will weigh me at 197.7 pounds
- The Bod Pod will have me at 196.85
- I will have 48 pounds of fat on my frame
- I will have 148.85 pounds of lean on my frame
- My body fat percentage will be 24.384%
Saturday, September 10, 2011
199.6
Monday, September 5, 2011
203.2... and 12.21 miles before breakfast

The Tanita score this morning was 203.2, meaning the Bod Pod would have me at 202.35. This is a new low.
Friday, September 2, 2011
Bod Pod IX... Meh!


The results of the Birthday Bod Pod are in, and in the famous words of Tedy Bruschi, that ain't what were looking for. That is probably a Bellichick saying.
- My scale weight was 203.734, down from 209.340,
- This is a loss of 5.606 gross pounds
- I now have 55.912 pounds of body fat, down from 62.414
- This is a loss of 6.502 pounds of fat.
- I know have 147.821 pounds of lean weight, up from 146.926 last time
- This is scarcely 0.895 of one pound increase of lean. I guess that beats a poke in the eye.
- My body fat percentage is now 27.4%, down from 29.8% last time.
- This is a 2.4% reduction in Body Fat Percentage, matching my BFP drop last time
- My body volume is now 89.135 liters, down from 92.042 liters last time.
- This is a decrease of 2.907 liters of body volume.
- I have Reduced my BFP from 44.1 % to 27.4%
- My lean percentage has gone from 55.9% to 72.6%
- I have altered my body composition 16.7%.
- Cut my body fat weight from 114.090 down to 55.912 pounds
- That is a loss of 58.178 pounds of fat.
- I have cut 51% of my fat weight in 16 weeks.
- I still maintain a net positive 3.261 pounds of lean weight.
- My body volume has diminished from 117.111 liters to 89.135 liters.
- My body volume has dropped 27.976 liters. Think of 28 x 1 liter bottles of Pepsi vanishing from under my skin.
Wednesday, August 31, 2011
206.2... again?
Monday, August 29, 2011
206.2
Sunday, August 28, 2011
207.9 a new post-gastric bypass low
- Nautilus-style workouts with free weights and machines.
- The ROM.
- The shake weight.
- Core training.
- Push-ups.
Thursday, August 25, 2011
212.0 and all is well
Sunday, August 21, 2011
212.0 before and after the pool party
Friday, August 19, 2011
Bod Pod VIII: Victory spoiled


So today was Bod Pod VIII day. Just what were the results?
- My body weight went down from 220.348 to 209.34.
- This is a loss of 11.008 pounds
- 8.452 of those lost pounds were fat
- 2.556 of those pounds were lean tissue.
- My fat weight dropped from 70.865 to 62.414 pounds.
- My body fat ratio dropped 2.4%
- My official BFP is now 29.8%
- I am now over 70% lean.
- My body volume dropped from 97.356 liters to 92.042 liters
- This is a loss of 5.314 liters of body volume
- For what it is worth, my BMI is now between 29 and 30. Few medical professionals take BMI seriously.
- I was hoping to go inside 60 pounds of fat.
- I was hoping to go inside 28% BFP
- My BFP dropped 2.4%, which is 0.4% more than we would expect under the benchmark average.
- I lost 1.452 pounds more fat than we would expect under the benchmark average
- This came at a high trade-off, as I lost 2.556 pounds lean more than I should not have lost
- I also failed to gain new lean, increasing the negative.
- The net difference in terms of body fat percentage is negligible. If I had simply kept my lean and been 2.556 pounds heavier, my BFP would be only 0.34% lower.
Wednesday, August 17, 2011
212.6... oh-oh!
Tuesday, August 16, 2011
211.9...?
Monday, August 15, 2011
212.4
Sunday, August 14, 2011
213.0

Ever had one of those mornings where you wake up feeling like an emaciated skeleton? One of those mornings where you felt like you could see every bone in your rib cage?
Saturday, August 13, 2011
The shape of the new Murder-Days
Intro
In the early stages of body composition testing, I decided I did not like the results I was getting. To make strides at improvement, I intensified my workout routine greatly. I began working out twice a day rather than once a day. I began doing the ROM upper body workout again. I began raising the intensity and speed of all my exercise. I added in the sauna.
Well, all that was fine in those days, but it is pretty fucking passé nowadays. I’m way beyond that level at this point. Frankly, I’m scaring some people with workload I’m taking these days. There ain’t one dude at my company who can carry the weight of my jockstrap in a cardio stress test. Perhaps BB [the black-belt holding marathoner] can battle me, but I wouldn’t bet on her if I was you.
What does the new murder-day look like? Yesterday was a new-style murder day. Let me tell you about what I did yesterday.
Morning Workout
- One minute of shake weight.
- 4 minute ROM upper body workout
- One minute of shake weight
- 4 ROM Lower body workout
- One minute of shake weight
- 90 seconds of ROM Abdominal rows
- 90 seconds of ROM Oblique twists
Lunchtime workout
- 22 Minutes of Olympic Rowing, at level 10, covering 4,650 meters 256 kcal
- 16 minutes of treadmill walking ranging between 3.6 and 4.0 miles per hour at 6 to 8.5 elevation. 210 kcals burned
Evening workout
- 12 minutes of biking starting at 160 watts of resistance, finishing at 210. 156 kcals burned
- 22 minutes of Lifefitness Crosstrainer, the mountain patern, @level 15, burning 361 kcal, covering 2.3 miles.
Commentary
Whether you realize it or not, it is the ROM that is the power gear in this workout routine. It is far and away the most difficult of these exercises, and it sets up everything else. Incidentally, the ROM is set for 210 pounds of resistance, which is far above my ideal body weight. If I wanted to comply with the easy rules, I would take my resistance down to something between 180 and 190. I am working 20 pound heavier than I have to according to the rulebook.
You might comment that the duration of those exercises trends to the short side. You are quite correct. The emphasis is on intensity and difficulty of resistance. The focus is not on duration of the exercise. The objective is to get my heart rate and respiration rate up rapidly, and stretch that capacity. If my muscles aren't sore and full of lactic acid at the end of each run, I did something wrong. I will need to intensify again next time for sure.
You can't argue with success. The new focus on difficulty and intensity is producing great results. I just experienced a fine recovery of lean muscle tissue, and new growth continues. I just shattered my last set-point and I'm racing again.
I pulled out the old Voldyne 5000 they gave me at the hospital after Gastric Bypass. This device is designed to help you stretch your lung capacity [and measure your lung capacity] in the immediate aftermath of major internal surgery. I rang the bell on my very first breath. I popped the meter all the way up to the 5 liter mark on the very first try.
Just what does that mean? It means that I have the capacity to suck in 5 liters of air (or more) with just one breath. It ain’t hard either. This means my lungs have excellent capacity. All else being equal, this should lead to an excellent capacity to do cardio vascular work. Believe me, it’s true.
Looking forward to Bod Pod VIII
I weighed in at 215.0 this morning on the Tanita scale, and Bod-Pod VIII happens in just 6 days. Just what can I expect? Well, let’s lay out what we know:
- I would weigh in at 214.15 on the Bod Pod this morning.
- This indicates that I have lost 6.148 pounds of gross tonnage in the past week.
- I have been losing weight at an average of approximately 0.5 pounds per day since this process began.
- This almost exactly in-line with the doctrine Dr. Quilici’s people have quoted for me.
- We have 6 days to go.
- Ergo, it is theoretically possible for me to lose another 3 pounds of fat during this time.
- I just broke through my last set-point, and my progress is bursting.
- According to the hypothetical projections I made in June, I am something like 7-9 pounds behind schedule, despite my burst of progress.
These facts leave me with a pair of monumental questions to answer. These questions have to be answered if I am to accurately predict where I will be on Friday
- Will current burst of progress produce a full catch-up effect? Will I get back on schedule because of this present burst?
- Even if the present free-fall catches me up, will this burst complete my catch-up by Friday? What if it finishes on the Monday after Bod Pod VIII?
If I were to lay-down a set of reasonable predictions, they would look like the following:
- I will lose 3 more pounds of gross tonnage
- I will add 2 pounds of lean weight to my frame
- My total fat loss will be 6.148 + 3 + 2 = 11.148
- My total weight will be 211.199 pounds
- My total lean weight will be 151.482 (149.482 + 2.0 = 151.482)
- My total fat weight will be 59.717 pounds.
- My lean/fat ratio will be 71.725% / 28.275%
- My body volume will decrease by 5.776 liters (11.148 / 1.93 = 5.776)
- My total body volume will be 91.58 liters
- This will leave me 10 pounds behind schedule
These are ambitious figures, but I think the present burst out of my last set-point justifies these predictions. Now, lean weight will play a major factor here. A drop in lean weight, or big gain in lean weight, will change these numbers significantly. As always, I have to watch my lean and maintain my lean carefully. I need to ensure my protein intake is sufficient in this coming week.
One very interesting point to make special note of: When I began testing, my body volume was 117.111 liters. If I hit my targets, my body volume will be 91.58 liters. This will mean that I will have lost some 25.531 liters of body volume since April 13, 2011. That’s a 21.8% reduction in body volume in a little more than 3 months. I will be something like 78% of my former size, and will have lost more than a fifth of my volume in just that time.
Think about 13 of those 2 liters of Pepsi you like to buy for game day. Imagine me walking around with 13 of those bottles attached to my body. Now imagine all of those bottles disappearing. That’s a stunning thought, isn’t it?
Of course, this pales in comparison to the 115.8 pound and (estimated) 60 liter drop in volume I have already experienced.