Showing posts with label Ndamukong Suh. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ndamukong Suh. Show all posts

Saturday, February 27, 2010

A coherent plan for rebuilding the Rams

Several friends have told me that my blog has being trending negative lately. I have been focused on what the Rams should not do, rather than stating any positive program for rebuilding the team. Sounds like Democrats complaining. I thought I had been clear earlier about what I believe we should do. Evidentially, these friends either have not read that program, or they have forgotten it.

Some tell me you constantly need to proclaim your program because folks believe it will change all the time. Perish the thought! If you are that wishy washy, end it now by kindly putting a gun to your head. Have a plan, stick to it.

On the off chance I have not been clear about this thing, I felt I would draft a comprehensive and clear statement about the direction I hope Bill Devaney and Steve Spagnuolo will go this off season.

Trades

We need to cloture arguments about drafting Sam Bradford by closing a deal for Michael Vick. It is better to do it earlier rather than later, as the Eagles will know they have us over a barrel if we pass on a QB in the draft before working a deal.

Why? We have a dogshit offensive line that needs three good new players. It is extremely unlikely that we can acquire 3 solid and make the 5 of them play as a unit in 2010. I am convinced that there is only one QB in the NFL, and available, who can survive and prosper behind the dogshit offensive line we are likely to field in 2010. That man is Michael Vick.

Will Vick be any good? As Dukes says: He knows this is the absolute last stop for him if he fails. I am convinced that Vick is a penitent man... for ruining his career if not killing the dogs. He strikes me as a guy who is desperate for second chance. Every thing he has said is pointed sharply at the fact that he laments destroying his career. It is always good to acquire a man desperate for a second chance. These guys usually explode.

Vick makes sense for other reason. As I have said so many hundreds of times, I believe the Rams should draft Tim Tebow at the top of the 2nd round if he is there for us to take. He will need one or two redshirt years to get ready. Vick blazes a trail for Tebow, setting up a Tebow era. Both are mobile, athletic Southpaw QBs who like to be in the Shotgun, and who like to run. Although it is hard to find two more radically different men, they have more in common on the field than you might think.

Free Agency

This is not a good time to be a have-not. The termination of the CBA favors the strong. New Orleans is in a sweet spot, not needing to franchise Jayri Evans. Most of the good prospects I had wanted for our team are now unavailable as restricted free agents. With that said there are still two worthwhile acquisitions we should make. A pair of guards named Stephen Neil (Patriots #61) and Bobby Williams (Bengals #63) have a reputation for being solid. They are both in their early 30s. If we get them, we will have a fighting chance. We will still need to draft at least one solid prospect, and hopefully gain another through releases.

It is also very important that we resign Daniel Fells. He was one of the few bright spots for us last season, and showed some real play-making ability. He's a keeper.

While on the subject of tight ends, Ben Watson of the Patriots is a free agent, and he is a dude who is rumored to have scored a 48 on his Wonderlic test. He can also play. He would be a marvelous acquisition for a football teams that needs to get smarter.

The Draft

Now we come to the all-important draft, my burning obsession and constant worry. We need to understand that most great teams build first and foremost through the draft. Free agents, trades, and cut-rehabs don't get it done.
  1. Ndamukong Suh DT Nebraska: Forget about drafting a QB in the first round. This is the prospect. There are only a few mega-stupid things you can do in this life to really destroy yourself. Swimming with sharks, whilst bleeding is stupid. Playing Russian Roulette with 6 bullets in the revolver is stupid. Starting a conventional infantry war in China is stupid. Trying to suntan inside an industrial microwave oven is stupid. However, selecting a QB in the first round of the 2010 draft is most incredibly stupid and self-destructive thing you can do.
  2. Tim Tebow QB Florida: Provided that J. Wayne Weaver isn't successful in convincing his cadre to select Tebow in the 1st, we should take him in the 2nd and develop him. 20 years hence, people will laugh at the fact that scouts didn't think he was a prospect. He will be another bullet in Kiper's arse. The alternate here is Dan LeFevour. I would also be welcoming of Colt McCoy. Incidentally, did you see Tebow run the 4.7 40 yard dash? Did you see him broad jump 9.7? Did you see him spring 38.5? There is a lot of material there to work with.
  3. Dexter McCluster WR/RB Ole Miss: Presupposing that he does not go in the 2nd round. I think this is a safe bet. A explosive play maker. The perfect lightning to Steve Jackson's thunder. He will kill people in the slot.
  4. Myron Rolle SS Florida State: Supposing that he is there for us to take. We need a super-smart safety to call our adjustments.
  5. Seyi Ajiratutu WR Fresno State: Supposing that he is there for us to take.
It is a bit foolish to project 4th and 5th picks. I won't predict or project 6th and 7th. So many chaos moments strike in the later rounds that you cannot predict (with any degree of confidence) who will be there and who will not. I think I have reason to believe that all of these players will be available when we draft.

Bear in mind that we select first in each and every round.

The objective of this draft is to get athletic playmakers with great good character, high intelligence, and excellent leadership qualities. Picks 1 through 4 have that in spades. I am not certain of my homeboy Seyi, but he strikes me as a good guy.

Friday, February 26, 2010

So John Clayton says we're taking Sam Bradford based on financial considerations, aye?

John Clayton just pissed me off a few moments ago. I usually don't blog this early in the morning, but I am going to have to get this load off my chest quickly this morning.

Clayton says financial considerations will supersede tallent evaluations in this 2010 NFL Draft. His argument goes like the following:
  1. The top pick in the 2010 draft will likely haul down a contract worth $12 million per year
  2. Defensive linemen in the NFL don't make $12 million per year.
  3. Applying the franchise tag to a defensive lineman usually costs $7 million
  4. Ergo the Rams will have to overspend on Ndamukong Suh by some $5 million
  5. Defensive linemen don't make that large of an impact on your winning percentage
  6. The Rams can draft Suh and finish with 3 victories next season.
  7. Ergo there is not much impact on wins and losses from overspending by $5 million to get Ndamukong Suh.
  8. The correct idea is draft Bradford.
  9. $12 million can be justified for a QB.
  10. A QB will impact the Rams' wins and losses more than a DT.
Ah bouy... so many logical fallacies... so little time... where do I begin? John Clayton's argument is predicated on a very large number of logical fallacies. These will be his undoing. Let us take this bastard's argument one step at a time.
  1. We have established that selecting a QB in the first round is a very high risk proposition
  2. You have a 66% chance of going bust when you select a QB in the first round
  3. Selecting a QB at the top of round 1 is an even lower percentage situation.
  4. The only time it ever really worked out was Troy Aikman; with respect also given to Peyton Manning.
  5. We have established that this is a poor quarterback year.
  6. We have established that the Rams have a dogshit offensive line. The Rams cannot protect him, period.
  7. We have established that the Rams have a poor crop of Wide Receivers. Bradford will have no one to throw too.
  8. We have established that Sam Bradford is a gracile and fragile QB. He is coming off of shoulder surgery on his passing arm. He does not take a hit well
Ergo sum, John Clayton's argument is absolute bullshit.
  1. The Rams cannot play Sam Bradford 2010
  2. If they do, the Rams' OL will get him killed
  3. Bradford will become a legendary bust in NFL history, rather than what he should become: A franchise QB.
  4. We will not get $12 million worth of impact out of drafting Sam Bradford
  5. He will not have that big of an impact on our winning percentage.
  6. We should not intentionally ruin Sam Bradford's career with malice of forethought.
  7. We should not intentionally waste our absolute #1 pick, foreseeing that it cannot workout.
  8. Suh is the correct pick
  9. Negotiate a cheaper deal with Suh.
It is absolutely shocking to me that John Clayton is so foolish to presume that you simply take a QB and it works out. We all know that this is a very high risk proposition. Is $12 m for a higher risk a better proposition that $12 m for a much lower risk?

Frankly, I am really getting sick and tired and pissed off because all of these so-called experts continue to try to misdirect my Rams towards a high-draft QB in a bad QB year. This is absolute stupidity of the highest order. I understand that the IQ of a lot of these experts is around 70-80 and they scored 6-9 points on their Wonderlic tests. Still, you aught to know better. Shame on you you fucktards.

Incidentally, you can read his bullshit here:

Sunday, December 27, 2009

So today is a bitter sweet day for the Rams

With just 1 game left on the schedule, my Rams remain a 1 victory team. We won against Detroit a long time ago, back on week 8 of the season. Together with unexpected upset victories by Tampa and Cleveland, we are now mathematically guaranteed to win the 1st pick overall in the 2010 Draft. This signifies that we are the worst team in the league.

As the clock wore down in the Cardinals victory today, the discussion was not about the Cardinals prospects in the playoffs. I found that odd. Rather, the men wanted to discus what the Rams would do with that #1 pick. Would we take Ndamukong Suh? Would we deal the pick? What the hell are the Rams going to do? They seemed intensely fascinated by this question. They seemed to believe the Rams could get some serious ammo by dealing the pick; 3 picks specifically. They seem to believe that there will be several serious minded suitors.

I sure hope so. Last year, we couldn't pay the Jets to take our #2 pick.

I already blogged on this subject, because I had a suspicion things would work out this way. You know how I feel about this subject: Defense is not our area of greatest need. Offense is our are of desperate need. As much as I would like to have a killer commando like Suh, I do not think we can afford to use our pick in this manner.

If someone is willing to load us with 2 first rounders for the top pick, we must take the deal. Those picks should turn into Russel Okung and Tim Tebow. We need to fix our horrendous offense. We have no chance of winning in 2010 unless we do.