So it is now time to tie up a couple of loose ends from past blog entries. As you know, I blogged a week ago back about the advent of the Panasonic G10 series. I was quite sanguine about the force of Moore's law, and how this HDTV was quite likely a further proof that Moore's law applies forcefully to HDTV technology.
Well... it is time to eat some crow. Nobody likes to be taken in by the hype. Nobody likes to fuck up. Nobody likes to admit that they are wrong about anything. However, it is time for me to eat some humble pie.
There are three important conclusions I reached after one hour with the G10 series at Magnolia:
- Technologically, the G10 is nothing special. It is not even an advance over Panasonic's current line up. The 850 series is better. The only positive thing that can be said for it is that it is a low-cost option. It is substantially cheaper the 800 & 850 series from Panasonic.
- THX mode absolutely stinks. You will never see a dimmer, darker, flatter, more lifeless color in your entire life. Those who ballyhoo this technology are absolutely and completely wrong. They couldn't possibly be more wrong. The ultimate reason I did not buy the G10 is because THX mode looks just plain terrible. I had to take it out of THX mode and customize it quite a bit before it began to look reasonably decent.
- David Katzmaier and Bryan Gardiner must be smoking crack together. That is the only logical conclusion I can reach after reading and viewing their statements about the Panasonic G10. They both view this unit as the Pioneer Kuro replacement. Readers will know that I am not a member of the cult of Kuro. I regard it as a strong performer, but vastly over-rated. With that said, the G10 is absolutely, categorically not comparable to the Kuro. The Kuro is a lot better than the G10. The only thing they share in common is glass and plasma
To say that I was not impressed by the G10 would be an understatement at best. I could have saved some $1,400 by purchasing the G10 rather than the Samsung Luxia. Believe me, I was very well aware of this fact as I made my decision... in the comfort of my computer room at home. I had an Excel spreadsheet in front of me, mapping out all the makes, models, vendors, prices, sales taxes, shipping costs, etc. I self-consciously pulled the trigger on a much more expensive unit. Why? Because I did not want to buy the G10. The quality level was too low to be acceptable, and drastically better options were (ultimately) affordable.
So don't be carried away with the hype. The Cult of Kuro is going through grief, as they openly state, because their King has died. They are casting about, looking for a successor. This is the first fish to pop out of the lake, and it is a plasma, ergo it must be the new king. Rubbish! Balls! Poppycock! Blarney!
So Dave, don't you think you are being a bit unfair to these fine gentlemen of quality and merit? They do talk about running benchmark tests.
As I have already stated several times in this blog, such benchmarks are predicated on the faulty proposition that the BT.709 is a perfect thing. It is not. If BT.709 is a perfect thing, and cannot be improved upon, the road is clear: Nail 709 or die. Such is not the case. BT.709 is a political standard, assembled by industry giants who wanted to manufacture HDTVs and programming at an affordable price. There are many ways to improve upon this standard. Ergo, nailing the BT.709 is not really that important, and may ultimately turn undesirable as technology advances. Arguments based on nailing BT.709 can be discarded rather easily.
